Thursday, August 11, 2011

Bersatu Demi Islam - Ilmuwan Muda UMNO

Bersatu Demi Islam - Ilmuwan Muda UMNO

Bersatu Demi Islam - Ilmuwan Muda UMNO

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 01:30 PM PDT

How small is our Police man ?

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 12:01 PM PDT

Can you believe that a Deputy Chief of Police could think like a 3 years old. I think the 3 years old would have better reasoning if he/she could read. But, certainly this chief can read, and read a lot too. Read what he said

http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/172725

Well, if you cannot read what he said, does not matter, read the UK story about riot.

An Open Letter to David Cameron's Parents

http://nathanieltapley.com/2011/08/10/an-open-letter-to-david-camerons-parents/


Is Malaysia Airports for sale?

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 08:05 AM PDT

Now that Fernandes got 20.5% of Malaysia Airlines for almost a song and soon to call the shots, one wonders what his next prey would be?

Would he want to control Malaysia Airports?

That proposition would not be too far fetched. In a matter of fact, it would be very much up his avenue. After having a very successful low cost carrier and two days ago inked a 'share swap' deal which got him the controls of a much needed Tier-5 airline, controlling airports would synergise the whole Tune Group business-turned-empire. Especially he already tried to use Sime Darby and build a dedicated low cost carrier airport somewhere near Labu.

That failed.

And he did not stop there. He was said to try his luck using Perak Menteri Besar Dato Seri Dr Zambry A Kadir. Parit Buntar is the most commercially viable spot for the dedicated LCCT airport for the North.

Malaysia Airports is a very good corporation to go after. They manage 39 airports in the country and four others abroad. The annual turnover is RM 1.1 billion where profits are recorded at RM 266 million. The most prized asset of Malaysia Airports is the new KLIA II LCCT, which would be completed end of next year. Currently, KLIA (with present LCCT) is handling 34 million passengers with 244,000 aircraft movements annually. In five years time, it would be raised to 50% more, where KLIA II would be expecting 30 million travelers through the dedicated LCCT terminal complex. Thus, it would be best to go for the kill in the soonest opportunity arises.

For the record, AirAsia have been owing Malaysia Airports a lot of dues. In 2008, then Minister of Transport reported to Parliament AirAsia owed RM 110 million. As of earlier this year, AirAsia is still owing RM 103 million. That is almost 10% of Malaysia Airports' annual turnover.

Tan Sri Bashir Ahmad Abdul Majid

Of course, Managing Director Tan Sri Bashir Ahmad Abdul Majid would be needed to be rid off first. Just like Tengku Azmil. He was shown the door the hour they inked the 'share swap' deal. Bashir would be in the way of Fernandes, who would want to call the shots.

Now, wouldnt all these be realistic? Probably. Let's see what will transpire soon. Or maybe sooner than some would never imagine. We are willing to bet that your guess is as good as ours; CIMB would probably be the deal-maker again for this.

*Updated Friday 12 Aug 2011 0030hrs

3.136948 101.660649


Conspiracy Theories from JFK,Anwar Ibrahim,Bersih, September 11, Individuals being able to bring down powerful people

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 07:39 AM PDT

We can't tell you how happy we are to bring you the third installment of Sassy Gay Friend just this month. Sure, our heroine-saving hero with a penchant for scarves is coming to us at a price – product placement — but at least we're getting to see more than just the occasional episode.
Last week's "Black Swan" episode was a hit, but this week S.G.F. gets back to his roots and helps out one of Shakespeare's ladies: Lady Macbeth.
"First of all, stop getting your political news from crazy old women who live in the bushes," isn't even the snappiest line in this rescue session, where S.G.F. convinces Lady Macbeth not to act like a crazed control freak. Watch the video below and check Sassy Gay Friend's spiffy new website and his Facebookfor more sassy gay goodness.related article
The reactivated sodomy trial against Anwar Ibrahim, dubbed Sodomy II, was never a moral campaign by Prime Minister Najib. > more
DALLAS — In Dealey Plaza, with the white "X" painted on the spot where President Kennedy was assassinated, ask anyone about the grassy knoll and the second gunman.
Conspiracy theories come with the territory here. And at Barbec's Restaurant on the other side of this sprawling city, six men sit on a covered porch and convene a meeting of the North Texans for 9/11 Truth group and talk about the government's lies about 9/11.
The group has 50 active members; 200 on the mailing list. And they number among many thousands who, after years of investigations, don't believe the official version of how the World Trade Center collapsed, who was responsible or what the government knew and when.
Politics doesn't have anything to do with it; two were once staunch, Bush-voting conservatives; two are progressives and two weren't even interested in current events until after the 2001 attacks.
"Before 9/11, I was a working class person, going through life, pretty much accepting everything given and told to me," said Bryan Black, a 50-year-old carpenter from Commerce, Texas, "I'm starting to see things. I'm more open to skeptical conversation."
The skeptics – they prefer the term "9/11 truth activists" instead of "truthers" – have persisted, even thrived in the decade since 2001, with proponents from former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel to comedian Rosie O'Donnell. And unlike the years that Kennedy assassination conspiracies took to develop, they have mobilized with lightning-like speed on the Internet, with YouTube videos of the trade center collapsing again and again.
"There's really a foundation of reality here," said Ted Walter, who has worked unsuccessfully to prod New York City officials into reopening an investigation of how 7 World Trade Center collapsed on the afternoon of Sept 11. "We believe that if all of the American public saw footage of building 7 on the nightly news, it would lead to widespread skepticism of 9/11."

Nurul Izzah Anwar.

KUALA LUMPUR, March 27 — Nurul Izzah Anwar once again challenged Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to debate policies outlined in Pakatan Rakyat's Orange Book with her father, Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

The PKR vice-president made the statement today while addressing Umno's denial that it was behind a recent sex tape scandal implicating Anwar.
"Indeed, if these claims have any basis, the acid test is for the Umno MPs to urge their president to agree to a public policy debate between the leader of Pakatan Rakyat Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.
"This will reveal Datuk Seri Najib Razak as either a true political warrior or merely a political pirate like some of his predecessors who continue to fire salvos from the sidelines," she said.
Anwar, the 63-year old political veteran, has charged that top Umno leaders had masterminded the sex tape scandal in a bid to bury his political career.
Earlier today, Umno supreme council member Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan stressed that attacks on Anwar have always been about his and PR's policies, and that Umno would never stoop so low.
The video hit media headlines on Monday when a mysterious "Datuk T" invited selected media personnel to Carcosa Seri Negara to view the recording.
The trio of Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Tamby Chik, businessman Datuk Shazryl Eskay, and Perkasa treasurer and former Umno senator Datuk Shuib Lazim have since been unmasked as "Datuk T".
Today, Nurul Izzah also issued a challenge to the Sarawak chief minister to debate with PKR Sarawak's chief, in light of the Sarawak election next month.
"In the same spirit, I repeat Keadilan's calls for the current chief minister of Sarawak Pehin Seri Taib Mahmud to accept the invitation to a public policy debate with Baru Bian, the PKR Sarawak chief.
"Let us see if Umno and the other Barisan Nasional component parties dare to accept this challenge, for it will reveal if they are truly for a Malaysian politics that is about the contestation of ideas and policies, or if they are really for character assassinations and political piracy," Nurul Izzah said.

"We will win, because we are right,
and because reason is on our side."

AUSTINKOSONG SON OF SCATTERBRAIN–The deceptive Judge INDEPENDENCE,IMPARTIALITY ,INTEGRITY ,EQUALITY ,COMPETENCE AND DILIGENC HE PRICE IT $$$ per kilo
If the Chief Justice will only lead by example I'm sure the performance of the judges will improve.
We talk about an independent judiciary. We talk about transparency and accountability. These are big words indeed. But do we know what are the standards that judges should meet? Malaysians are fighting for change. But most do not understand what changes are needed. Maybe this report can help you understand what we should be seeking in an improved judiciary. on rosmaaa order?it's mindboggling!Public Prosecutor has deceptively merely manufacturing evidences against Anwar
EDITED BY TAXIDRIVER

WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM THE SMELLY DRANKEN…AUSTINE PAUL EARNED FOR HIMSELF A PLACE IN INFAMY.NOT BY MERITS

TO THE SMELLY DRANKEN INDIAN AUSTINE PAUL THIS DOESNT MATTER People will only believe what they want and willing to believe." is totally untrue.
people are not blind to see all the 'coincidences' (read manipulation) in trials which are hell bent to convict the innocents and all the 'technicalities' (also read manipulation) to exonerate the criminals.
Example:
Trivoli still under construction on the case's alleged date vs. deletion of immigration record of a certain mongolian
see the differences?TO THE SMELLY DRANKEN INDIAN AUSTINE PAUL THIS DOESNT MATTER
They are the Police to fabricate evidence,the Judiciary to convict the accused irrespective of whether he can put up a creditable defence
on rosmaaa order?it's mindboggling!Public Prosecutor has deceptively merely manufacturing evidences against Anwar
the Judiciary to convict the accused irrespective of whether he can put up a creditable defense.
WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM Augustine earned for himself a place in infamy.not by merits
THE GOBBLEDEGOOK OF AUGUSTINE PAU IN THE HIGH COURT'S DECISION IN ANWAR SODOMY 1case ALL THAT MATTERS ISNaib Ketua Pemuda UMNO. I laughed out loud to see a reasonably high ranking person from UMNO writing this crap of an article.
byRaja Petra Kamarudin
172. The practice of law includes work performed outside of a court and that has no immediate relation to court proceedings. It includes conveyancing, giving legal advice on a wide range of subjects, preparing and executing legal instruments covering an extensive field of business and trust relations, and other affairs. For a judge to be employed full-time, during a sabbatical year, in a branch of the government as a special adviser on matters related to courts and the administration of justice, may amount to "practising law". Views about the scope of this prohibition vary according to different local traditions. In some civil law countries even judges serving in a final court are allowed to perform work as arbitrators or mediators. At times, in anticipation of retirement, a judge in a common law country has been permitted to participate in remunerated work as an international arbitrator in a body established by a foreign government.when the governmence effectiveness and rule of law. Voice and accountability,burning burning najib fiddle with sodomy2 directed by rosmah" can we afford another Anwar prosecution"Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan?
Acting as an arbitrator or mediator
173. Ordinarily, at least in common law jurisdictions, a judge should not act as arbitrator or mediator or otherwise perform judicial functions in a private capacity unless expressly authorized by law. The integrity of the judiciary is commonly thought to be undermined if a judge takes financial advantage of the judicial office by rendering private dispute resolution services for pecuniary gain as an extrajudicial activity. Even when performed without charge, such services may interfere with the proper performance of judicial functions.beautifully beastifull rosamah the director of sodomy2,so the begining of the persecution of the malaysian opposition leader
174. A judge should not give legal advice. However, in the case of close family members or close friends, the judge may offer personal advice on a friendly, informal basis, without remuneration, while making it clear that he or she must not be treated as giving legal advice and that, if necessary, any legal advice needed should be professionally sought.
175. A judge has the right to act in the protection of his or her rights and interests, including by litigating in the courts. However, a judge should be circumspect about becoming involved in personal litigation. As a litigant, a judge runs the risk of giving the impression that he or she is taking advantage of his or her office. The judge also risks having his or her credibility adversely affected by the findings of judicial colleagues.← 14-year prison sentence for SMS joke on Pakistani president President Asif Ali Zardari mr 10%

related article http://engagemalaysia.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/political-comedy-satire-the-najisrosmaa-the-sayfool-story-the-malaysian-version-watergate-who-put-him-in-who-pushed-in-maa-maamiah/

ANCHOR BEER Hisham 

REASDMORE To anchor beer Hisham New media don't spread lies The Root of All Police Shooting Death: Chaos In North London

Some seriously troubling questions in Malaysia
Kim Quek, Asia Sentinel

An unbelievable spectacle took place in the bizarre murder trial of Mongolian beauty Altantuya Shaaribuu on June 29. Karpal Singh, the lawyer for the victim's family, attempted to ask a question about a "government official" allegedly seen in a photograph with the victim. At that point, both the prosecutor and the defense lawyer sprang to their feet in unison to block the question.
This resulted in a shouting match, with Singh on one side, the victim's cousin on the stand, and the combined forces of the prosecution and defense blocking the line of questioning.
Earlier, a similar division of forces occurred when a Mongolian witness – a girlfriend of the victim told the court that immigration entry computer records of the deceased and her two Mongolian companions, including the witness, had been mysteriously erased. When Singh asked the court to take proper note of this highly irregular event, both the prosecution and defense objected to the evidence as irrelevant, and insisted that it be expunged.
Now, isn't that a strange phenomenon? A prosecutor is supposed to seek justice for the deceased victim's family against the murderers, so how come the prosecutor is now ganging up with defense lawyers to oppose the victim's family lawyer? Is this a case of prosecutor vs. defense or a case of prosecutor plus defense vs. victim's family? Obviously, the prosecution and defense seem to have plenty of common interests. What are those common interests?
The answer may lie in the identity of that "government official" that allegedly appeared in the photograph with Altantuya that both prosecution and defense tried so hard not to allow into court.

Graphics courtesy Michael Chick
The picture
On Day 10 of the trial, Altantuya's cousin Burmaa Oyunchimeg testified that after Altantuya returned from France, she went to Hong Kong to meet Burmaa, and showed her a photograph of Altantuya and her lover, Abdul Razak Baginda, who is accused of conspiring in her murder, and "a government official" taking a meal together. Answering Singh later, after the shouting match in the court had subsided, she said this "government official" was Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak.
She could distinctly remember the name, she said, because it bears a similarity to Altantuya's acknowledged lover's name, and she even asked Altantuya whether they were brothers. Burmaa further added that the photo had also been shown to Altantuya's father.
Now, the revelation of Najib in the photo would not have caused such a sensation if not for the deputy prime minister's oft-repeated denial of any knowledge of Altantuya, including a public denial during a recent by-election, when even the name of Allah was invoked.
What does Najib have to say now that his denial is directly contradicted by the witness Burmaa? His press secretary Tengku Sarifuddin Tengku Ahmad issued a brief statement on June 30 saying that the deputy prime minister had declined to comment for two reasons. One, any comment might be sub judice, since the case is in court, and, two, Najib had already repeatedly denied an acquaintance with the girl in the past, "as such, the issue over the picture does not arise," the spokesman said.
Sub judice? That's ridiculous. How could a simple statement like "I have never had my photo taken with Altantuya" be sub judice? In fact, being the number-two leader in the government, Najib is absolutely duty-bound to say outright whether he was ever photographed with Altantuya, in view of the serious implications of Burmaa's allegation.
The issue over the picture does not arise? Equally ridiculous. In fact, the opposite is true. Precisely because of Najib's past denials, it is all the more imperative that Najib must stand up now to clarify.
Guilty conscience?
There is only one explanation for Najib's past denials and his present silence: A guilty conscience. If Najib's conduct with respect to the case had been above-board, there would be no reason for him to deny an acquaintance with his friend Abdul Razak's friend Altantuya. Similarly, if the allegation of the picture is false, it is inconceivable and totally incomprehensible that Najib should have chosen not to refute Burmaa's allegation.
In fact, Najib seems so worried about the publicity of the picture that his secretary called editors in the local press and requested them not to blow up the issue. This resulted in the explosive story being absent from the local headlines the next day. (In one Chinese paper – Guang Ming – the Najib story hit the front page in the evening edition, but disappeared completely by the next morning). And of course, Anwar Ibrahim's criticism of the trial and his specific call on Najib to clarify the issue of the picture during a press conference was generally blacked out.
However, despite such new suppression, irreversible damage is done. There is little doubt that Najib is deeply troubled and his political position seriously weakened.
Manipulation
That this murder case has been subjected to serious political manipulation has been obvious from the very start, when the police commenced their highly questionable investigation, right through to the present trial when the conduct of lawyers for both sides appear increasingly dubious. Instead of the prosecutor seeking the truth and the defense lawyer fighting for the accused, both seem preoccupied with an overriding mission – to prevent the whole truth from emerging. Their combined efforts to cover up the issue of the immigration record and the identity of Najib Razak in the picture are just two examples of such conduct.
The highly irregular nature of this case was also marked by frequent and mysterious changes of legal personnel, resulting in a complete changeover of the defense team, the prosecutors and the judge even before the hearings began. These weird phenomena were crowned by the shock appearance of a new team of prosecutors who were appointed only hours before the hearing was supposed to begin, thus necessitating an impromptu postponement of the trial for two weeks. None of these changes of legal personnel has been properly explained, except for the resignation of Abdul Razak's first lawyer; Zulkifli Noordin, quit, he said, because of "serious interference by third parties".
Under these circumstances, the public must brace itself for more aberrant scenarios from this court, while Najib and his supporters may have to keep their fingers crossed in the days ahead when many more witnesses have yet to walk through what must appear to Najib as a minefield.
On a more serious note, this unseemly trial does not exactly add credit to Malaysia's system, whose already wretched image has just been further mauled by the shameful finale of another sham trial – that of Eric Chia of Perwaja Steel fame. After seven long years of investigations and three years of court hearings, that case was thrown out due to lack of prima facie evidence. With that, the long-drawn out Perwaja Steel saga ended without finding any culprit for the mountain of losses (more than RM 10 billion) suffered by taxpayers.
There has been a spate of criminal cases being dismissed of late due to inadequate investigations and poor prosecution, indicating that the downward slide of our criminal justice system, which began in the Mahathir era, has gotten worse under Abdullah Badawi's leadership. With the criminal justice system in a shambles, the rule of law is in jeopardy. And that is an important benchmark to judge the efficacy of Abdullah's administration vis-à-vis his reform agenda.
Kim Quek is a Malaysia-based commentator.
For many, conspiracy theories aren't terrifying; they're more comforting than the idea that an event as terrifying as Sept. 11 could be so – random.
Conspiracies can be a "security blanket" for explaining away the horrific, asserts Patrick Leman, a University of London professor who researches 9/11 theories. "It stops us from having to confront the unpredictability of life."
Jonathan Kay, a columnist with the Canadian newspaper The National Post and the author of a book about conspiracy theories, said it's normal for people to seek out complicated and detailed explanations of big events.
"There is something in the human mind that rebels against the idea of random forces or individuals being able to bring down powerful people or powerful icons," said Kay.
There's no real estimate of the numbers of people in the 9/11 "truth" movements – there's no one leader of the skeptics. A group called Remember Building 7 presented New York's City Council with a petition in 2009 signed by 80,000 people calling for an independent probe into the attacks. Other groups include Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Scholars for 9/11 Truth and the 9/11 Commission Campaign, founded by Gravel.
The "truthers" generally have about a dozen beliefs surrounding what happened on that day, although there are some variations on who was responsible for the attacks and why:
_ Explosives brought down the World Trade Center, not hijacked jetliners.
_ There were warnings of the impending attacks from 11 different countries, and fighter jets could have intercepted at least one of the four planes that day.
_ Criminal conspiracies within the government caused the attacks.
Malaysian Government CORRUPTED TO THE CORE
Malaysian police CORRUPTED TO THE
CORE
Malaysian main stream media SPIN Lies
All because of The
ROT IN THE
HEAD !
Headed by A MURDERER & BONELESS WOLF with a Cabinet of Thieves &
Murderers
Why are Malaysians still stomaching this Evil Abuse ?
Or do you all
just ask for it ?
Time for PEOPLE POWER !!!
Wake up !
Get Together !
Form
Support Group
Think – Brainstorm
Rise & March
Topple the EviL BN
REGIME
and Once n for all
Place People of
Very High Integrity
in Power and

Change the Fate of the Nation
Make a Decision
Dont just Leave it to fate

TAKE CHARGE & DESIGN !
yes ¤DESIGN¤
Your IDEAL
PEOPLE'S GOVERNMENT

Fairly & Justly
ONE for ALL
ALL for PEOPLE !
its Now or Never
Just Do iT
!

So who has 'misunderstood' the ISA?
Friday, 31 July 2009 18:33
It is now being claimed by some that the Internal Security Act has been 'misunderstood' by a significant section of the Malaysian public. But Farish Noor argues it is the ruling elite who have 'misunderstood' the ISA and what it is meant to do. And for that reason, one understands why Malaysians from all walks of life now want us to move on from the despotism of the past and to discard such laws that have been abused for so long, too many times.
It is now being claimed by some that the Internal Security Act has been 'misunderstood' by a significant section of the Malaysian public, and if only they can be made to 'understand' it they would come to realise that it is after all a good tool that ought to be kept in the coffers of the state.
That such a claim can be made today is interesting, for at least it makes the concession that there are enough Malaysians out there who reject the manifold uses and abuses of the ISA so as to warrant the call to have it abolished, or at least so radically revised that it cannot be abused further. However, we are left with the question: who, exactly, has 'misunderstood' the ISA? The Malaysian public or the politicians who run the country?
Lest we forget, let us remind ourselves what the ISA is all about. The ISA document describes exactly the sort of security threat that it is meant to deal with, and it identifies these threats as military and pseudo-military threats to the nation. It regards as dangerous groups that accumulate and distribute arms, uniforms, banners and flags. In short it is a law that was and is designed to deal with para-military and militia threats to the country that may come from underground terrorist groups or hidden armies that have been set up with the purpose of conducting war against the legitimate state of Malaysia .
Over the decades, however, we have seen countless Malaysian citizens of all walks of life rounded up under the ISA, ostensibly for the sake of public safety and security. Journalists have been detained 'for their own safety'. Academics, activists, social workers, religious leaders, students and politicians alike have been the victims of this law. It is for this simple reason that the Malaysian public now feels that the interpretation of the ISA law has far exceeded its limit and that it has been abused for politically instrumental ends.
Proof of this comes in the form of the many Malaysian politicians who today stand as members of Parliament or the various state assemblies of the land, who were themselves victims of the ISA in the past. If indeed these politicians were real threats to national security, would they have been elected by the Malaysian electorate? The fact that they were voted to represent the people means that the people at least do no see them as security threats; so who does?
This brings us back to the question of who exactly has 'misunderstood' the ISA. There is no evidence whatsoever to suggest that the Malaysian public wishes to see blood and mayhem in our streets. Most Malaysians would agree that if some nutter wishes to fly a plane into the KLCC complex or plant a bomb in Parliament, such a lunatic has to be apprehended immediately in order to save lives.
But what the Malaysian public objects to is when laws such as the ISA are interpreted at whim by politicians who take liberties with its meaning and import and when laws such as the ISA are used as the most convenient tool to silence the legitimate political opposition in the country.
Furthermore, we all know that the ISA remains as an odd colonial relic from the past, which has been discarded or replaced with laws that are more just and humane in many other postcolonial societies. Yet in Malaysia today – a country where moral policing has become normalised and where a woman is about to be whipped for drinking beer – the ISA is but the tip of the iceberg of routine state control and policing that has gone too far.
Malaysians all want a safe and stable country where everyone can live their lives in ease and safety, but perhaps the time has come to reject not merely the laws but rather the abuse of the law that allows for detention without trial for people who have neither armed themselves or formed guerrilla groups to threaten the Malaysian nation-state. Unless and until the powers-that-be understand this simple fact that ought to be evident even to a child, we would argue that it is the ruling elite who have 'misunderstood' the ISA and what it is meant to do. And for that reason, one understands why Malaysians from all walks of life now want us to move on from the despotism of the past and to discard such laws that have been abused for so long, too many times.
INTERNAL SECURITY ACT, 1960 (Act 82) is an Act to provide for the internal security of Malaysia, preventive detention, the prevention of subversion, the suppression of organised violence against persons and property in specified areas of Malaysia, and for matters incidental thereto. [West Malaysia - 1st August. 1960; East Malaysia - 16th September 1963.]

"WHEREAS action has been taken and further action is threatened by a substantial body of persons both inside and outside Malaysia-

(1) To cause, and to cause a substantial number of citizens to fear, organized violence against persons and property; and
(2) To procure the alteration, otherwise than by lawful means, of the lawful Government of Malaysia by law established;
AND WHEREAS the action taken and threatened is prejudicial to the security of Malaysia;
AND WHEREAS Parliament considers it necessary to stop or prevent that action;"
1. WHAT IS ISA?
  • The Internal Security Act 1960 (ISA) is a preventive detention law in force in Malaysia.
  • Any person may be detained by the police for up to 60 days without trial for an act which allegedly prejudices the security of the country.
  • After 60 days, one may be further detained for a period of two years each, to be approved by the Minister of Home Affairs, thus making indefinite detention without trial.
  • In 1989, the powers of the Minister under the legislation were made immune to judicial review by virtue of amendments to the Act. Now, only the courts are 'allowed' to examine and review technical matters pertaining to the ISA arrest.

2. WHEN DID THE ISA BECOME LAW?

  • The precursor to the ISA was the Emergency Ordinance 1948 -1960 promulgated by the British Colonial Regime to counter the then Communist Insurgency.
  • The ISA came into force on 1st August 1960.

3. WHY WAS THE ISA INTRODUCED?

  • The Government of Malaya legislated the ISA as a continuation of the Emergency Ordinance 1948 to specifically deal with the threat of the Communist Insurgency.
  • When the ISA was introduced in 1960, solemn promises were made in Parliament by then prime minister Tunku Abdul Rahman, his deputy Tun Abdul Razak and the Minister of Home Affairs Tun Dr Ismail Abdul Rahman, that the law will be used judiciously and only against communists, terrorists and subversives.
  • The Communist Insurgency officially ended in 1989 with the signing of the Haadyai Peace Accord.

4. WHAT ARE THE GOVERNMENT'S REASONS FOR RETAINING ISA AFTER THE PEACE ACCORD OF 1989?

  • No country can do without preventive detention laws to safeguard internal security.
  • Security and stability are pre-requisites to ensure economic prosperity. Laws like the ISA are indispensable tools for maintaining the racial, religious and social harmony.
  • Preventive laws like the ISA are needed to deal with the potential problems and conflicts in a multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-cultural society.
  • The ISA is not only about preventive detention. It deals with such matters as ban on quasi-military organizations and subversive publications, restriction on the movement of undesirable persons and proclamation of security areas.
  • The ISA is needed in this age of cross-border terrorism to safeguard the sovereignty of the nation.

5. HOW MANY ARE IN DETENTION?

  • Since August 1960, 10,662 people have been arrested under the various preventive detention laws.
  • 4,139 were detained under Internal Security Act.
  • 2,066 were served with restriction orders governing their activities and where they live.
  • 12 people were executed for offences under the ISA between 1984 and 1993.
  • As of July 2009, 13 people are still under detention.

6. WHO ARE THE PEOPLE MOST AFFECTED BY THE ISA DETENTIONS?

  • The spouses, children and close family members who are deprived of their loved ones and; often times the primary source of their household income.
  • The family members are faced with the social stigma, and in many cases are ostracised by relatives, neighbours, and friends.
  • The family members have also known to face 'harassment' from the authorities.

7. WHY THE ISA IS CONSIDERED A DRACONIAN LAW BY CIVIL SOCIETY?

  • The ISA is contrary to fundamental principles of international law, including the right to liberty of the person, to freedom from arbitrary arrest, to be informed of the reasons for arrest, to the presumption of innocence, and to a fair and open trial in a court of law.
  • The ISA goes against the right of a person to defend himself in an open and fair trial. The person can be incarcerated up to 60 days of interrogation without access to legal counsel.
  • A person detained under the ISA during the first 60 days is held incommunicado, with no access to the outside world.
  • Torture goes concurrently with ISA detention. Former detainees have testified to being subjected to severe physical and psychological torture. This may include one or more of the following: physical assault, forced nudity, sleep deprivation, round-the-clock interrogation, death threats, threats of bodily harm to family members, including threats of rape and bodily harm to their children.
  • Prolonged torture and deprivation have led to detainees signing state-manufactured 'confessions' under severe duress.
  • The Internal Security Act (ISA) remains the core of the permanent, arbitrary powers to detain without trial available to the Executive.
  • The ISA has been consistently used against people who criticise the government and defend human rights. The Act is an instrument maintained by the ruling government to control public life and civil society.
  • Since 1960 when the Act was enacted, thousands of people including trade unionists, student leaders, labour activists, political activists, religious groups, academicians, NGO activists have been arrested under the ISA. Many political activists in the past have been detained for more than a decade.
  • Beyond the violation of basic rights experienced by particular individuals, the ISA has had a wider, intimidating effect on civil society, and a marked influence on the nature of political participation and accountability in Malaysia.
  • The ISA has been used to suppress peaceful political, academic and social activities, and legitimate constructive criticism by NGOs and other social pressure groups. It limits the political space for important debates on issues of economic policy, corruption and other social challenges.

8. WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR ABOLISHING THE ISA?

  • The ISA permits the executive to detain any one it likes without a court trial, without any possibility of judicial review of the minister's decision and without any limits on how many two-year periods of detention may be ordered.
  • The ISA is a blatant violation of all international canons of rule of law, natural justice and due process.
  • Article 149 of the Constitution under which the ISA is enacted permits special legislation when subversive action has been taken or threatened "by any substantial body of persons". The use of the ISA to detain individual dissidents indulging in non-violent opposition to the Government in peace time is a violation of the letter and spirit of Article 149.
  • National sovereignty is a shield against foreign aggression but it cannot be used as a weapon against one's own people. There is a difference between national security and security of the government. The 1SA has often been used to safeguard the latter and not the former.
  • The overall effect of the ISA is that the executive is allowed to play the role of accuser, investigator as well as adjudicator. No government can allow one man to exercise such complete power over another's life and liberty.

9. HOW WILL THE NATION COUNTER THE THREAT OF CROSS-BORDER TERRORISM IF THE ISA IS ABOLISHED?

  • The Government can introduce an Anti-Terrorism Act specifically designed to counter cross-border terrorism. However due process must be incorporated in this legislation to ensure the rights of the individual.

10. WHY SHOULD I SUPPORT THE MOVEMENT TO ABOLISH THE ISA?

  • You, your family, your friends are not 'safe or immune' from detention under ISA.
  • A police officer with the rank of Inspector and above can arrest without a warrant and detain you for a period of 60 days with or without 'good' reasons for suspicion.
  • You need to defend your democratic right to freedom of speech, assembly and association as guaranteed by Article 10 of the Federal Constitution.

11. WHAT CAN I AS AN INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN DO TO SUPPORT THE "NO2ISA" MOVEMENT?

  • Educate yourself first, then your family, friends and co-workers on the basics of the ISA.
  • Lobby your MPs and Aduns to pressure the Government to abolish ISA.
  • Join and contribute to initiatives organised by civil society groups to abolish ISA.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology conducted a probe that took six years to complete of the tower collapses; the last report found that fire caused the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, a skyscraper north of the twin towers. In the collapses of the twin towers, the agency found that extreme heat from the jetliner crashes caused some steel beams to lose strength, causing further failures in the building until the entire structure succumbed.
The investigation "was the most comprehensive examination of a structural failure ever conducted," said Shyam Sunder, lead investigator of the collapse investigation and led to 40 building code changes to make safer, terror-proof skyscrapers. NIST maintains a website with its reports and computer-based animations that reconstruct its findings to reach out to the public.
Sunder acknowledges it hasn't reached everyone.
"We really can't explain why some people question our findings about the WTC collapses when we have done our best to present those findings and how they were derived as clearly as possible," Sunder wrote in an e-mail.
It begs the question: why is there such a distrust of government when it comes to 9/11? Is it due to feeling alienated from our fractured political system, a bad economy, or something else?
For Bob McIlvaine's son, it was the injuries found on his son Bobby's head, arm and skin that made him think the hijacked jetliner and building collapse couldn't have done it. He believes that explosives were detonated in the towers' basement before the planes hit the towers.
McIlvaine has not been able to determine where his son was when he died, but from the injuries – which include skin that was burned post-mortem – he assumes that his son was in or near the tower's lobby. McIlvaine questions the government's explanation that a fireball came down through the elevator shafts and burned those in the lobby.
"I spend three hours a day, every day, doing research on 9/11," said McIlvaine. "To me, this was a murder investigation. My son was murdered."
Tom Theimer watched the World Trade Center crumble while drinking coffee and watching television in his suburban Dallas home. Shaken, he bought flags for his porch and bumper stickers for his car reading "We will never forget."
A few years later, a friend of Theimer's wife casually mentioned that 9/11 "was an inside job." Theimer was livid and turned to the Internet, to prove the friend wrong.
The websites, the books and the documentaries he saw online persuaded him. He was wrong, and so was the system.
"I was duped," Theimer said. "It really hurt. I cried. I couldn't sleep for months."
Theimer said that he and others in Dallas are planning to show a new 9/11 documentary on the 10th anniversary. Remember Building 7 is trying to raise $1 million by Sept. 11 to support a new investigation into the collapses.
A conference on alternate 9/11 theories is being held in Toronto on Sept. 11.
The conference is headed by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, which was founded by James Gourley, a 31-year-old Dallas-area attorney who began to question the events of Sept. 11 during law school, while watching an activist make his argument on C-Span.
Gourley is aware of the theories about how skeptics are simply trying to justify and explain a random, horrific event.
"It's basically a backwards way of saying we're psychologically deranged," he said. "It's questioning the psychology of the people instead of questioning the facts."
Even in the heart of the conspiracy theory world, some find the alternate theories hard to believe.
At Dealey Plaza in downtown Dallas, Scott Dew hawked commemorative Kennedy assassination newspapers to tourists, standing under an oak tree, just steps from a white "X" painted on the asphalt that marks where President Kennedy was assassinated in 1963.
Dew's newspapers – which cost $5 each and come encased in a plastic sleeve – devote several pages and diagrams to the varying theories of bullet projectiles and second shooters on the grassy knoll.
Kennedy's assassination was "a conspiracy by the government," Dew says. "Back then, in '63, this was a money and power deal."
But Sept. 11? A conspiracy? He shakes his head.
"I believe bin Laden was the attacker. I don't believe the other theories that President Bush or the government had anything to do with it. That would just be a little too sinful," he said.

Darah & Nyawa PAS Hanya Untuk DAP

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 06:00 AM PDT
Dikhabarkan pemimpin pakatan terutamanya dari DAP telah mengkritik Ketua pemuda khawarij PAS kerana mengeluarkan kenyataan yang berbaur ekstremis . Ada yang melahirkan rasa kurang senang apabila membaca tulisan artikel Nasrudin yang langsung tidak mengambarkan keterbukaan dan liberalisme PAS.

Dalam tulisan beliau yang terbaru,ketua pemuda khawarij ini berkata :-

Kami Pemuda PAS bertegas dalam apa jua keadaan, dengan komitmen tenaga, wang ringgit, masa malah darah dan nyawa akan dipersembahkan demi mempertahankan aqidah ummah.
Tantawi hanya cuba tunjuk hero depan budak budak pemuda PAS saja,Tak lebih dari itu.Sekadar mengembek dalam kandang sendiri. Darah dan Nyawa khawarij PAS sekarang ini hanyalah untuk DAP.Mereka sanggup mengadai jiwa dan raga mereka asalkan DAP tidak diapa apakan.

Banyak contoh yang kita dapat lihat,apabila DAP dikritik,dihentam maka berduyun duyun khawarij akan tampil kehadapan menyalak mempertahankan tuan mereka.



Pisau kata " ketua pemuda PAS sendiri pun dah tak boleh nak bercakap soal jihad fisabillah,Apatah lagi nak mempertahankan akidah umat Islam."



Failing The Spot The Difference Game

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 05:36 AM PDT

AUG 11 — It does seem like honesty is a rare commodity in Malaysia. Not once before, during and after the Bersih rally have the BN government, police and senior politicians spoken truthfully about the rally.

Now we have the country's No. 2 cop alluding that police put down the Bersih rally because otherwise things would have gone awry like the London riots.

This is the same line of argument put forward by Umno bloggers and the mainstream media (one can only surmise that instructions were handed down by Putrajaya).

Deputy Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Khalid Abu Bakar is rewriting history. It is an open secret that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, after an audience with the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, decided to offer the Bersih people the use of a stadium.

Soon after that meeting, he chaired a meeting of government officials and announced that he had decided to offer a stadium to the Bersih cause, prompting a round of congratulations by attendees who were pleased that a reasonable solution to the stand off was in the offing.

That stadium offer was revoked the next day. Why? It is anyone's guess but a representative of an NGO met the PM a day before July 9 and said that the PM was talking about an uprising to overthrow the government and about resistance from groups within Umno.

It is interesting that some of the PM's insiders are now blaming the Home Ministry and police for the mishandling of Bersih, saying that both groups told Najib that the Bersih people would not vacate the stadium for weeks ala Tahrir Square in Egypt and would force the collapse of the BN government.
These insiders say that Najib's gut feeling was to allow the rally to take place but was persuaded otherwise.

All that sounds nice on hindsight but the fact is that he took the advice of people — home minister and the police — who don't have a clue on the DNA of Malaysians. Ninety-five per cent of people who marched on July 9 probably have jobs, unlike the unemployed in Egypt and the yobs in London.

The Bersih people were marching for electoral reform. A sizeable number are from the middle class, and the middle class all over the world are not looters or people who are willing to lose their employment by staying in a stadium for days or weeks!

So for the police and Home Ministry to liken the Bersih rally to the situation in Egypt and London is dishonest.

The police clamped down on the rally because their political masters in Putrajaya told them to do so. 

Now Khalid is trying to put a sheen of credibility on the over-reaction by the police by drawing a parallel between Bersih and the London riots.

How far has the rot set in?

--- What A Load of Rubbish by The Malaysian Insider, 11 August 2011

*******************

I was laughing my ass of loud on Khalid Bakar's comments. Not only me, but in twitter space, everyone too is having a good laugh at how the deputy IGP puts the London riots with Bersih protests. However, in this case, Khalid has failed in his language because it shows that there are people who are unable to discern the difference between riots and protests.

A few of us got "maki hamun" by some at twitter about talking bullshit in this subject matter. But I just simply asked those a question of whether they are able to understand the clear definition of riots and protests. Even the dictionary also defined it clear and concise of what is protests and riots. Therefore, if you are unable to discern the difference, either you have fared poorly in English in school or, as I have told someone, MSM inaccuracies and spinning as been feeding you with shit. Full stop, and I don't even bother to reply at all.

The London riots originally started with the killing of an innocent man. Similarly, the Los Angeles riots in 1992 started with the beating of Rodney King and the first acquittal of the four police officers involved. While it's clear that the four were guilty, acquitting them got the city into furor and thus days of carnage started. Bersih 2.0 in contrast was just only a one day, 3 hour affair on the streets to send an electoral message to Najib and Co.

I sometimes asked the nay sayers whether they have read the history of Malayan Union, which I always remembered that part while in secondary school. UMNO was formed out of the protest against the Malayan Union. They came out in demos to make a collective statement to the English that they don't want the plan. Otherwise, Malaya then Malaysia would not have exist. This of course contradicts Dr. M's famous statement in the aftermath of the Perak takeover in 2009, which he said "Demo is not our culture". Sounds contrasting, yes?

As what Pete said today, the riots in London happened for no reason apart to loot, plunder and making mayhem along the way for nothing. If anyone of you who have watched The Dark Knight, you would see the tag title, "Welcome to a World Without Rules." A world without rules is like you can do anything you want including riots above there. Good and bad allowed, no holds barred. But as what was witnessed in Bersih, there have been a clear set of rules - a three hour affair, once message has been sent to the King, disperse. Simple as it. Bersih's protest, as he said, was to make clear political statement to the Najib administration and the Election commission.

The BERSIH march was a political statement. There was no political statement in the UK riots. It was all about plundering, looting, robbing and stealing.

No, we can't compare BERSIH to the UK riots. This would be like banning drivers/bikers who do not drink and only allowing drunks on the road because drinking and driving causes only 1.4% of traffic accident deaths.

Did not the Malays oppose the Malayan Union that the British were trying to impose on Malaya through a street demonstration? And was it not because of this demonstration that the British abandoned the plan for the Malayan Union and instead the Federation of Malaya was formed?

-- Ban Non Drinkers, Malaysia Today

Of course, when the ruckus happened on 9 July, this shows that Najib has violated his own tenets, whereas the many events happened during Pak Lah's time indicate that he too violated his own Islam Hadhari tenets.

The main mistake that politicians made out of paranoia was to associate protest with riots. This was how the tone of antagonism towards Bersih started. The 1969 riots happened because the ruling party could not stomach losing the customary 2/3rds control fair and square in the elections. From there that's where they got berserk, fueled with delusions. A side note though, my late grandfather was absolutely upset later when it was known that his ex-colleague Harun Idris started the whole thing.
Back to Khalid Bakar, the mistake was assuming that people are stupid. In fact, the statement simply reflects of making himself look stupid or "membodohkan rakyat". I always held that man as an unqualified person sitting behind Ismail Omar and a liar on the fateful night on 9 November 2008. In fact, there are more and more people that start to laugh at his face since this morning for the nay sayers, I am not the only one needed to be criticized of.

GEREJA MURTAD!

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 03:48 AM PDT


(Sijil Baptism Azlina Jailani oleh Church of Our Lady Fatima, Brickfield bukti jelas pembabitan gereja memurtadkan umat Islam di Malaysia)

Salam 2 all.

Teman melihat ada golongan yang cuba menafikan penglibatan pihak gereja dalam gejala memurtadkan umat Islam khususnya bangsa Melayu didalam negara ini. Sehingga ada dikalangan pimpinan PAS sendiri mempersoalkan tindakan JAIS menyiasat Methodist Church Damansara Utama yang dipercayai menjalankan kegiatan dakyah keristian dikalangan orang Melayu Muslim pada 03 Ramadhan 1432/ 03.08.20011 lepas. Dikala umat Islam sedang menjalani 'ibadah puasa, kita dihina sekali lagi dengan isu murtad!

Peristiwa yang sama berlaku pada tahun 1997, lebih tepat Ramadhan 1997. Dihari pertama umat Islam sedang berpuasa, segelintir kristian la'natullah telah menculik dan melarikan Aishah Bukhori sedang ayahanda Aishah, Tuan Haji Bukhori mengimamkan solat tarawih di Masjid Taman Rimba Terjun, Pontian. Dalam sekelip mata mereka berjaya membawa Aishah menyeberangi Selat Johor memasuki Singapura tanpa paspot, dan kemudian terus diterbangkan ke Australia sehelai sepinggang. Ini menimbulkan syak dikalangan umat Islam bahawa terdapat konspirasi terancang untuk menculik dan membawa Aishah Bukhori, macam mana seorang rakyat Malaysia beragama Islam boleh dibawa lari tanpa sebarang paspot?

Cuma bezanya pada masa itu, PAS menjadi juara kompang kampung mencanang kes murtadnya Aishah Bukhori. Teman yang menjadi peguam kes tersebut diarak kehulu kehilir berceramah diatas pentas PAS menceritakan kisah murtad Aishah Bukhori. Puluhan ribu poster ditampal oleh para mujahidin dan bakal syuhada PAS, atas pokok, tiang letrik, bus-stop dan macam-macam tempat. Ada penceramah PAS yang mengambil kesempatan menumpang semangkuk pentas bersama teman. Kalau tengok ceramah dema yop lagi ganas dan brutal dari teman. Siap rimbok meja, air liur bersepai-sepai terhambur dengan maki-hamun terhadap kristian, kafir, UMNO dan Kerajaan. Dan tak lupa derma jihad juga dikutip konon untuk perjuangan jihad menentang murtad. Mana pergi duit derma jihad tu jangan tanya teman yop; walaupun teman tengok ada antara mereka yang boleh bertukar kereta beli rumah hasil jual kaset ceramah teman!

Tapi hari ini, kaum yang rimbok meja bersembur airliur berjihad menentang murtad tu yop dah tukar qiblat. Hari ni dema rimbok meja marah kalau ada orang ganggu gereja yang nak murtadkan umat Islam. Pejuang tulin saperti Dr. Hasan Ali yang ikhlas mahu mencegah gejala murtad mereka tuduh sebagai agen UMNO yang dibayar oleh oleh PM untuk merosakkan ukhwah dan perpaduan PAS dengan biaDAP dan para kafir harbi la'natullah. Sampai tugas Dr. Hasan Ali sebagai Exco Agama dema nak hijack yop, dema nak JAIS jumpa dema terus tanpa melalui Dr. Hasan Ali, Exco yang jaga JAIS! Malah kaum Anwarinas ni siap nak pecat Dr. Hasan Ali lagi yop. Dulu dema maki-hamun UMNO kerana kononnya membiarkan gejala murtad, hari ini dema maki-hamun UMNO konon membayar Dr. Hasan Ali untuk mencegah murtad! Tak ke gila punya kerja namanya ni yop. Yang konsisten dalam perangai itu ialah maki-hamun! Yang penting kot mana pun UMNO dan PM mesti dimaki-hamun. Rasanya kaum Anwarinas ni kalau tak maki-hamun UMNO dan PM sehari dema boleh kena demam kura yop!

Berbalik kepada cerita gereja terlibat dalam gejala murtad, banyak bukti yang teman ada yop. Pertama kes Aishah Bukhori sendiri. Aishah semasa mengisytiharkan diri dia murtad kepada ayah dia Hj Bukhori melalui telefon pada 19.10.1997 sedang berada disebuah gereja di Panchor Jaya, Rasah, Negeri Sembilan. Apabila Haji Bukhori dan keluarganya pergi ke gereja tersebut, berlaku pertengkaran kerana mereka tidak benarkan Aishah diambil oleh keluarganya. Keluarga Aishah terpaksa balik hampa kerana tidak mampu berbuat apa-apa.

Kita jangan lupa peranan aktif yang dimainkan oleh Bar Council dalam isu murtad Aishah Bukhori. Malahan sebenarnya murtadnya Aishah Bukhori membabitkan penglibatan secara langsung seorang peguam kafir ahli Malaysian Bar iaitu Leornard Teoh Hooi Leong. Beliaulah orang yang membuat permohonan ke Mahkamah untuk perintah habeas corpus untuk membebaskan Aishah daripada jagaan keluarga beliau.

Dalam permohonan bertarikh 28.11.1997 itu, secara jelas Leornard Teoh menyebut pada perenggan 6, bahawa dia dilantik "untuk memberi nasihat kepada Aishah berkenaan dengan pertukaran agamanya kepada Kristian dan elah menyediakan surat Akuan Sumpah untuk Aishah menolak dan meninggalkan agama Islam."

Pada perenggan 23 Leonard Teoh berkata bahawa "Aishah sedang dikurung secara salah oleh keluarganya. Dan Leornard mendakwa tindakan ibubapa, abang dan bapa saudara Aishah telah melanggar hak kebebasan Aishah menganut agama pilihannya iaitu Kristian Khatolik".

Dan inilah Majlis Peguam yang sama yang Ambeega Sreenavasan pernah menjadi Presidennya yang kemudiannya ditabal oleh PAS menjadi kalipah dalam himpunan haram 09.07.2011!!!

Begitu juga kita jangan lupa rekod pertama penglibatan gereja didalam kes murtad orang Melayu beragama Islam pada tahun 1987. Disebuah gereja di Petaling Jaya, seorang anak Melayu beragama Islam ditabalkan buat pertama kalinya dalam sejarah Malaysia sebagai paderi Melayu dibumi orang Islam ini. Jamaluddin Osman, mengikut rekod adalah anak Melayu pertama diisytihar sebagai paderi secara terbuka disebuah gereja di Petaling Jaya. Beliau juga terlibat secara langsung dan aktif untuk memurtadkan anak-anak Melayu ke agama kristian.

Jamaluddin Osman, atau nama kristiannya Padre Joshua Jamaluddin, telah ditahan oleh polis dibawah Akta Keselamatan Negeri kerana kegiatannya cuba mengkristiankan anak-anak orang Islam dianggap mengancam keselamatan dalam negara. Namun sekali lagi Majlis Peguam dan beberapa NGO memainkan peranan aktif mencabar penahanan Jamaluddin Osman dibawah ISA. Mahkamah Persekutuan tiada pilihan selain daripada membebaskan Jamaluddin Osman kerana peruntukkan ISA tidak membenarkan seseorang ditahan kerana memurtadkan orang Islam.

Inilah dia Majlis Peguam yang sama yang Ambeega Sreenavasan menjadi Presidennya, yang kemudian diangkat oleh PAS menajdi kalipah mereka dalam himpunan haram 09.07.2011!!!

Kegiatan gereja yang terlibat secara langsung dalam kegiatan memurtadkan umat Islam di Malaysia paling jelas berlaku dalam kes murtadnya Azlina Jailani. Teman kemukakan bukti dokumen diatas, iaitu sijil membaptiskan (atau mengkristiankan) Azlina Jailani. Ini adalah dokumen Mahkamah, bukan rekaan. Pada masa itu, PAS terima dokumen ini sebagai bukti, dan antara yang terlibat secara langsung dengan teman membantah murtadnya Azlina Jailani. Tak tahulah sekarang, takut nanti Ustad Hadi mintak teman kemukakan 4 orang saksi. Ialah, semenjak berukhwah dengan biaDAP ni, serban pun boleh longgar yop!

Teman perturunkan apa yang disebut didalam sijil tersebut:

Certificate of Baptism:

This is to certify that AZLINA BT JAILANI (LINA) child of JAILANI BIN SHARIFF and his wife KALTHUM BIN OMAR born at Selangor date of Birth 08 January 1964 was baptized in CHURCH OF OUR LADY FATIMA-BRICKFIELDS KL on the 11 May in the year of our Lord 1998.

In the Name of the Father
and the Son
and of the Holy Spirit

Duty of Parents & Godparents You are responsible that this child be educated in the Faith, furthermore, it is your duty to bring up this child to live the Faith by observing God's Commandment as Christ taught us, namely loving God and your neighbor. Godparents are to help parents in their duty as Christian mothers and fathers.

Godfather: S.S. Santiago
Godmother: Rosy Doraisamy
Minister of Baptism: Joseph A. Pereira

Stamp of Church:
Church of Our Lady Fatima,
Jalan Sultan Abdul Samad,
Brickfields, 50470 KL

Jelas daripada sijil diatas pembabitan secara langsung sebuah gereja, iaitu Church of our Lady Fatima di Brickfields dalam kes murtad seorang Melayu Muslim bernama Azlina Jailani. Dan kes Azlina Jailani, atau nama kristiannya Lina Joy (KP No: 640108-10-5038) telah dibawa ke Mahkamah Tinggi (MTKL No: R2-24-30-2000), kemudiannya dirayu ke Mahkamah Rayuan (RS No: W-01-29-2001) dan akhirnya dibicarakan sehingga ke Mahkamah Persekutuan (RS No. 01-02-2006W). Akhirnya Mahkamah Persekutuan dengan beraninya membuat keputusan bahawa seseorang Islam itu tidak boleh murtad melainkan dengan, dan hanya jika diizinkan oleh, sebuah Mahkamah Syariah yang berbidang kuasa. Maka mengamuk sakanlah kaum kaafirun dan yang sewaktu dengannya.

Kegagalan mereka dalam kes Azlina Jailani, diikuti pula dengan kes perebutan jenazah Mohamed Moorthy Abdullah, dan kes perebutan anak S. Shamala menyebabkan mereka bergabung bersatu tenaga beberapa NGO termasuk Bar Council, Majlis Perunding Agama Hindu, Kristian, Budha & Sikh, Suaram, Hakam, Sisters in Islam, AWAM, WAO, WCC, WDC dan beberapa lagi NGO mencadangkan penubuhan Suruhanjaya Antara Agama @ IFC dengan 17 tuntutan yang kesannya akan menjadikan murtad itu halal dan sah, serta Islam sebaris dengan agama lain dalam negara ini.

Strategi kafirun ahzab ini ditentang oleh umat Islam yang bersatu dibawah berpuluh NGO diketuai oleh PPI, Peguam Pembela Islam dan Pertubuhan Pembela Islam. Himpunan Sejuta Umat diadakan di Masjid Wilayah Persekutuan dengan kehadiran puluhan ribu umat Islam. Kempen tandatangan Sejuta Umat dilancarkan dan alhamdulillah lebih sejuta tandatangan berjaya dikutip dan dipersembahkan kepada Majlis Raja-Raja.

Kesatuan umat Islam itu menjadi kegerunan kepada kaum kaafirun ahzab ini, maka mereka juga mengatur strategi untuk memecah-belahkan umat Islam. Sejak tahun 2006, mereka melakukan tusukan jarum halus melaga-lagakan umat Islam. Akhirnya mereka berjaya mempergunakan himpunan haram Hindraf untuk mencetuskan gelombang pemecahan itu, bilamana Anwar Ibrahim mengambil sikap menyokong pertubuhan haram tersebut. Ini membawa kepada beberapa insiden selepas itu dan Anwar berjaya mempengaruhi beberapa orang pimpinan PAS untuk bersama beliau yang akhirnya membawa kepada munculnya kaum Anwarinas didalam PAS yang qiblat mereka adalah kepada Anwar Ibrahim, bukan kepimpinan Haji Hadi.

Dan pilihanraya 2008 menyaksikan buat pertama kalinya umat Islam berpecah. Perpecahan ini memberi ruang kepada kaum kafir melaui parti cauvinis dan rasis biaDAP untuk menjalankan peranan yang akhirnya umat Islam kehilangan cengkaman kuasa politik Melayu-Muslim. Kelesuan, kedayusan dan kebaculan umat makin menjadi-jadi. Ini terbukti bila berlaku beberapa insiden dan isu, yang kemuncaknya ialah tuntutan penggunaan kalimah ALLAH oleh kristian dalam bentuk triniti mendapat sokongan Anwar Ibrahim dan kaum Anwarinas, yang berhempas pulas menyokongnya. Dan kaum kafir khususnya parti cauvinis biaDAP tahu bahawa perpecahan umat Islam sudah parah, kerana ada dikalangan mereka bersedia menjual agama mereka, termasuk kalimah ALLAH demi untuk memenuhi impian rakus politikus kalkatus ke Putrajaya!

Mutakhir bila isu bible versi Bahasa Indonesia muncul, tanpa perlu puak kafir kristian bersusah payah, kaum Awarinas yang beriya-iya menyokong dan mendesak supaya kebenaran dan kebebasan diberi kepada kristian untuk mengimpot masuk bible dan risalah dan penerbitan dalam bahasa indonesia. Sehingga akhirnya kerajaan yang dipimpin oleh umat Islam terpaksa tunduk dan memberi kebenaran tersebut, kerana pihak kafir kristian dan sekutu mereka menyatakan kalau PAS dan PKR benarkan, kenapa UMNO nak halang pulak! Sehingga berita palsu dibawa ke peringkat Pope di Vatican bahawa kaum kristian dizalimi dan dianiaya serta di"persecute" oleh Kerajaan Islam Malaysia! Maka kaum kafir tahu bahawa cengkaman mereka keatas segelintir umat Islam sudah sempurna; hanya tinggal masa untu dilaksanakan agenda syaitan mereka menumbangkan kerajaan pemerintahan umat Islam dalam negara ini.

Kelesuan, kebaculan, dan kebisuan segelintir umat Islam terbukti bila isu murtad Nor Azman Beginda terbongkar baru-baru ini. Nor Azman Beginda, adalah saksi untuk Anwar Ibrahim dalam kes liwat Anwar . Beliau juga adalah calon PKR dalam PRN Negeri Sarawak. Kisah murtadnya Nor Azman terbongkar apabila timbul isu anaknya membawa sosej babi ke sekolah. Kalau murtadnya Aishah pada tahun 1997 menjadi isu besar sehingga ramai yang bertakbeer mahu berjihad, namun terbongkarnya isu murtad Azman dipandang sepi, malah ramai yang dahulunya mujahidin tiba-tiba menjadi syaitan PBB - pekak, bisu & buta.

Tiba-tiba, perancangan ALLAH pun bermula. Tanpa disangka-sangka, sedang umat Islam menjalani 'ibadah puasa tahun ini, tercetus isu Gereja Methodist Damansara Utama menjalankan kegiatan dakyah terhadap umat Islam pada hari ketiga Ramadhan. Kegiatan yang diselimuti dengan program bantuan kemanusiaan dan makan-makan, secara halus mereka memasukkan dakyah mereka. Tindakan JAIS melakukan siasatan terhadap kegiatan itu dihebohkan sebagai satu "serbuan keatas satu majlis muhibbah dan kemasyarakatan didalam sebuah gereja".

Dengan menggunakan perkataan-perkataan yang bombastik dan menggemparkan, isu itu diputar sebagai satu tindakan mencampuri urusan gereja dan melanggar hak asasi manusia dan kebebasan beragama. Tekanan dikenakan terhadap Menteri Besar yang dengan bangangnya telah mengambil sikap apologetik dan menuntut maaf kepada kaum kafir ini walaupun belum mendapat lapuran penuh insiden tersebut. Dikalangan kaum Anwarinas muncul jaguh-jaguh kampung merimbuk meja memaki tindakan JAIS.

Alhamdulillah, ALLAH membuka hati YB Exco Hal Ehwal Islam Selangor, Datuk Hasan Ali untuk bangkit mempertahankan tindakan JAIS dan membela maruah Islam. Tindakan berani Datuk Hasan Ali telah menukar habis spektrum isu ini. Pendedahan berani Datuk Hasan Ali bahawa memang terdapat bukti kegiatan mendakyahkan umat Islam oleh gereja Methodist tersebut mengejutkan umat Islam. Walaupun dimaki-hamun oleh kaum Anwarinas, walaupun Presiden yang besar serbannya tidak menyokongnya, walaupun diserang bertubi-tubi oleh kaum kafir, Datuk Hasan Ali langsung tidak gentar, malah mengeluarkan kenyataan tegas dan jelas: saya rela dipecat demi mempertahankan aqidah umat Islam!!!

Kenyataan itu disambut oleh umat Islam. Sokongan kepada Datuk Hasan Ali dan JAIS bertambah hari demi hari. Akaun facebook yang dibuka untuk membela Datuk Hasan Ali mencapai jumlah mengejutkan, sudah hampir 20,000 orang menyatakan sokongan terhadap Datuk Hasan Ali hanya dalam beberapa hari. Sokongan yang melangkaui batasan politik kepartian. Dan berita mengejutkan apabila Ketua Dewan Ulama' PAS, Ketua Pemuda PAS dan beberapa tokoh ulama' menyatakan sokongan terbuka kepada Datuk Hasan Ali. Insyallah Ramadhan ini akan membawa semangat Badar kepada umat Islam yang semakin lesu dan layu akibat mainan politiking melampau segelintir politikus kalkatus yang rakus ke Putrajaya.

Hari ini terbukti memang benar terdapat kegiatan cuba mendakyahkan umat Islam dalam acara di Gereja Methodist itu. Bukan itu sahaja, terkini terbongkar kisah rupanya gereja Methodist itu adalah gereja haram. Ianya tiada kelulusan daripada pihak Majlis Bandaraya Petaling Jaya, yang hanya meluluskan pembinaan sebuah pusat komuniti bukannya gereja. Kita mendesak supaya MBPJ dan Kerajaan Selangor mengambil tindakan segera menyita dan menutup gereja tersebut tanpa sebarang dolak dalik lagi!!! Teman semakin yakin janji ALLAH itu benar, dan ALLAH akan memenangkan umat Islam akhirnya!

Ingatlah, isu dakyah gereja Methodist ini bukan isu politik, bukan isu kepartian, bukan isu UMNO-PAS. Tetapi ini adalah isu umat Islam, dan umat Islam mesti bersatu. Ketepikan semua sentimen politik, buang semua assobiyah kepartian. Kita umat Satu Tuhan, Satu Nabi, Satu Kitab, Satu Qiblat. Marilah kita bersatu dibawah ukhwah Islam berdasarkan Al Quran & Sunnah!!!

Diatas rakusan melapah aqidah
umat bangkit bersatu wadah
semangat Badar mari diserlah
sinar Ramadhan membawa barakah

Tiada Tuhan melainkan ALLAH Yang Satu, kami ikhlas beragama kepada ALLAH, walaupun kafir ahzab tidak menyukainya. ALLAH itu Benar, ALLAH akan mebantu kita menghancurkan kafir ahzab yang bersatu, dan meletakkan musuh-musuh Islam dibawah tapak kaki umat Islam. ALLAHUAKBAR WALILLAHHILHAMD!

MEMPERTAHANKAN AQIDAH ITU JIHAD!!!
MENCEGAH MURTAD ITU JUGA JIHAD!!!

Wallahua'alam & Wassalam.

Zulkifli Bin Noordin
Khamis
11 Ramadhan 1432
11 Ogos 2011


Polis UK Jamu Nasi Pada Perusuh?

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 02:30 AM PDT

David Cameron mengikut jejak langkah Ds Najib untuk menembak perusuh dengan meriam air yang membuat kacau dinegara beliau.

Sebelum ini Dr Asri dan beberapa pemimpin haprak pakatan berkata demo di UK aman malah tindakan PDRM adalah paling zalim didunia.

Nah,sekarang UK pun dah tiru Polis Malaysia apa macam?


Sedia guna meriam air


SEORANG perusuh berjalan di hadapan halangan jalan raya yang dibakar di kawasan Toxteth di Liverpool, kelmarin. Kira-kira 200 belia dilaporkan membaling objek ke arah polis di kawasan tersebut. – AP

LONDON 10 Ogos – Perdana Menteri David Cameron berikrar akan mengakhiri keganasan 'jelik' yang berlaku di negara itu dan membayangkan kesediaan menggunakan meriam air buat pertama kalinya terhadap perusuh.

"Kita perlu melawan balik dan ia telah bermula,'' katanya selepas mesyuarat krisis Jawatankuasa Kecemasan Kerajaan (Cobra) hari ini.

Beliau berkata, pelan kecemasan tersedia untuk menggunakan meriam air dengan notis 24 jam. Penggunaannya akan pertama kali di tanah air British.

''Keganasan yang berlarutan ini harus dihentikan. Kita tidak akan benarkan budaya ketakutan wujud di jalan-jalan kita,'' katanya. – Utusan

Pisau kata " Polis UK jangan sampai pi jamu nasi buffet kat perusuh pulak"


Lelaki 78 isteri dipenjara seumur hidup

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 02:00 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -

SAN ANGELO, Texas - Seorang pemimpin mazhab poligami, yang menjadi tajuk utama akhbar pada tahun 2008 yang ditahan polis dalam satu serbuan, dijatuhkan hukuman penjara seumur hidup selepas dia didapati melakukan serangan seks ke atas dua gadis muda.

Pemimpin itu, Warren Jeffs berusia 55 tahun tidak menunjukkan sebarang reaksi ketika hukuman itu dibacakan oleh pihak juri yang mengambil masa kurang sejam untuk membuat keputusan di sebuah mahkamah kelmarin.

Mazhab yang dibawa Jeffs menjadi tumpuan umum apabila polis Texas menyerbu rumahnya yang berhampiran bandar kecil Eldorado pada 2008 dan membawa keluar lebih 468 budak lelaki dan perempuan ekoran terdapat dakwaan berlaku penderaan seksual dan fizikal yang sistematik.

Namun pihak mahkamah kemudian mengarahkan budak lelaki dan perempuan itu dipulangkan kepada ibu bapa mereka.

Menurut pihak pendakwa raya, Jeffs mempunyai 78 isteri. - Agensi

‘Tiada lagi sentuhan kasih sayang’

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 01:30 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -

MASALAH...kegagalan guru untuk mendidik boleh mengakibatkan pelajar menjadi lebih bermasalah kerana kurang perhatian dan kasih sayang.
GURU dulu tegas dan komited sewaktu menjalankan tugas, namun di sebalik ketegasan itu ada hati yang bersih dan ikhlas mendidik pelajar menjadi anak bangsa berjaya.

Disebabkan sikap bertanggungjawab itu, mereka bukan saja dihormati malah mulia kedudukannya dalam kalangan masyarakat.

SALAH SIAPA...jika pelajar jadi begini, siapakah yang harus dipersalahkan.

PENDEKATAN SEBENAR...guru perlu bijak menggunakan pendekatan betul bagi memastikan proses pembelajaran berjalan lancar dan cemerlang.

Kini, ketegasan, integriti, profesionalisme, hak bersuara serta taraf guru semakin suram dan merudum di mata masyarakat malah menyedihkan kerana golongan itu mudah diperkotak-katikkan pelajar sendiri.

Ini menjadikan hubungan antara guru-pelajar semakin jauh, dingin dan bergolak. Kesannya, semangat guru kian pudar melaksanakan tanggungjawab lebih dedikasi.

Disebabkan tidak mendapat sokongan selain bebanan tugasan semakin bertambah, motivasi sebahagian guru mulai luntur dan culas melaksanakan tanggungjawab. Mereka tidak lagi memegang falsafah ingin bertanggungjawab memberi pendidikan, tetapi lebih kepada mengajar semata-mata.

Mengajar lebih menjurus kepada kaedah 2M iaitu membabitkan proses penyampaian ilmu pengetahuan dari guru kepada pelajar dan lebih menumpukan kepada pembangunan intelektual atau akademik.

Manakala mendidik membentuk sahsiah atau akhlak dan memerlukan tempoh masa panjang untuk membentuk akhlak pelajar yang baik.

Persoalannya apakah beza mendidik dan mengajar?

Pensyarah Kanan Program Pendidikan Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), Dr Isya Awang, berkata ada perbezaan antara konsep mendidik dan mengajar dalam ilmu pendidikan.

Beliau berkata, mengajar lebih ketara berbentuk fizikal manakala mendidik sebagai 'sentuhan' emosi dan kasih sayang guru kepada pelajar.

"Boleh dikatakan sebahagian guru hari ini hanya menumpukan pada konsep mengajar berbanding mendidik. Mereka datang ke sekolah hanya untuk mengajar, menghabiskan silibus dan menerima gaji hujung bulan.

"Tiada lagi 'sentuhan' atau perasaan kasih sayang telus seperti ditunjukkan golongan guru dulu. Guru dan pelajar kurang berinteraksi, sentiasa mencipta konflik.

"Bagaimanapun, menuding jari pada guru semata-mata adalah tidak adil kerana kita terpaksa menerima keadaan itu kerana senario hari ini tidak semuanya memihak kepada mereka," katanya.

Katanya, kadangkala guru dibebani kerenah pelajar yang pelbagai menyebabkan ada yang sukar menumpukan perhatian. Akibatnya, akan ada pelajar yang terabai terutama mereka yang bermasalah.

"Tambah memburukkan keadaan, ibu bapa pula datang menyerang dan mempersoalkan kredibiliti guru. Apabila semua pihak menghentam, tidak mustahil ada yang mengambil langkah drastik bersikap sambil lewa dan enggan mengambil tahu," katanya.

Menurutnya, kebanyakan ibu bapa hanya tahu mengambil pendekatan 'lepas tangan' atau bertindak secara melulu tanpa usul periksa. Secara tidak langsung memberi tekanan kepada guru untuk mencorakkan gaya pembelajaran mereka.

"Jalan mudah, mereka hanya mengajar dan tidak mahu mendidik. Ironinya, guru berpendapat, tidak perlu menjalin atau mengambil berat mengenai pelajar kerana ibu bapa sendiri kurang memberi sokongan.

" Mengapa mesti menanggung beban sedangkan ibu bapa hanya relaks. Ia seperti barah hingga akhirnya menghakis sikap profesionalisme guru yang sepatutnya bertanggungjawab penuh terhadap tugas dan tanggungjawabnya," katanya.

Ditanya mengapakah guru zaman dulu mempunyai nilai 'sentuhan' ajaib hingga menerbitkan hubungan rapat dengan pelajar, beliau berkata tugas guru dulu jarang 'diganggu' atau digugat pelbagai tugas sampingan lain.

Menurutnya, guru dulu boleh menumpukan perhatian pada tanggungjawab hakiki kerana semua pihak faham makna pendidikan dan menuntut ilmu.

"Masalahnya hari ini guru atau pihak berkenaan kurang memahami makna itu tapi lebih mementingkan keputusan akademik . Malangnya itu bukan jaminan cemerlang sahsiah diri.

" Secara tidak langsung, menggambarkan bagaimana proses mendidik gagal dilaksanakan sedangkan untuk berjaya, gabungan keduanya perlu seimbang supaya dapat menampung kekurangan yang ada," katanya.

Guru pula sebaliknya ada yang tidak mampu mempunyai komitmen tinggi terhadap tugas kerana segelintirnya menjadi guru semata - mata mahu mempunyai gaji dan pendapatan samping yang lebih berbentuk material.

" Dibandingkan guru dulu, mereka ikhlas dan tidak berkira mengenai bayaran, guru sekarang sebaliknya malah ada yang terus melanjutkan tugas di luar dengan harapan memperoleh pendapatan sampingan, misalnya tuisyen.

" Itu tidak salah namun sejauh manakah guru mampu membina hubungan baik dan mesra dengan pelajar. Adakah mereka mengambil berat dengan bertanya khabar atau masuk kelas, mengajar, beri kerja rumah kemudian keluar?

" Suasana seperti ini tidak sihat kerana perhubungan guru - pelajar hanya termaktub dalam kelas semata - mata. Guru tidak mengenali pelajar, begitu sebaliknya, justeru bagaimanakah sentuhan kasih sayang itu boleh menerbitkan hubungan yang erat," soalnya.

Guru, katanya, perlu berusaha mengembalikan semula martabat sebagai golongan dihormati manakala masyarakat termasuk ibu bapa perlu memberi peluang golongan itu mencorakkan proses pendidikan mengikut acuan tersendiri asalkan tidak menyalahi peraturan.

" Guru jadilah golongan bertanggungjawab, kembalikan semula maruah yang sudah lama tercalar. Proses melahirkan masyarakat dan bangsa berguna tidak boleh dizahirkan melalui satu mekanisme semata-mata.

"Boleh mengajar tapi tekankan juga kepentingan mendidik. Barulah lengkap pakej untuk melahirkan pelajar cemerlang akademik, budi dan peribadi seperti termaktub dalam falsafah Pendidikan Kebangsaan," katanya.

Tokoh Guru Kedah 2009, Sayed Mahadzir Sayed Omar pula berpendapat teknik mendidik dan mengajar guru berbeza dibandingkan guru zaman dulu.

Menurutnya, guru dulu mengajar berasaskan kasih sayang dan semangat patriotisme juga menerima kepercayaan tinggi daripada ibu bapa yang rela 'menyerahkan' anak untuk dididik.

" Mereka tidak kisah anak 'dipukul' kerana tahu itu tanggungjawab guru menjadikan mereka berjaya. Malangnya hari ini tidak boleh kerana banyak akta atau peraturan perlu dipatuhi.

" Bayangkan, kalau pelajar bermasalah, tapi tangan guru 'terikat', apakah boleh pelajar itu diasuh menjadi manusia yang baik? Justeru tidak hairanlah, ramai guru hari ini lebih senang mengajar daripada mendidik kerana tidak mahu masalah berbangkit," katanya.

metro/-

Maut dirempuh kereta api

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 01:20 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -

BAGAN SERAI: Tindakan seorang ahli perniagaan cuba menyeberangi landasan kereta api menggunakan lintasan haram berakhir tragedi apabila kenderaan pelbagai guna (MPV) dipandu dirempuh sebuah kereta api penumpang, petang semalam.

Kejadian jam 3.40 petang semalam menyebabkan kenderaan mangsa diseret sebelum terhumban hampir 20 meter berhampiran kilometer 59.5 landasan kereta api, Alor Pongsu, di sini.

Difahamkan kereta api penumpang Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad (KTMB) itu yang datang dari arah utara menuju selatan tidak sempat berhenti lalu merempuh MPV dipandu mangsa yang berada di tengah landasan.

Ketua Polis Daerah Kerian, Superintendan Mat Fauzi Nayan yang dihubungi berkata, mangsa yang memandu MPV model Toyota Unser dipercayai datang dari arah pekan Alor Pongsu menuju ke kawasan pedalaman.

Menurutnya, mangsa didapati cuba menaiki tebing landasan berkenaan tanpa menyedari kehadiran kereta api penumpang itu.

"Kenderaan mangsa yang berada di tengah landasan dirempuh tepat kepala gerabak kereta api terbabit sebelum terpelanting dan terbalik sejauh 15 meter.

"Mangsa dikenali sebagai Choo Cheang Phang, 46, mengalami kecederaan parah di tubuh dan kepala. Mangsa berjaya ditarik keluar oleh orang ramai yang menyedari nahas itu," katanya.

Menurutnya, rempuhan kuat itu menyebabkan kenderaan mangsa remuk pada bahagian sisi kanan bersebelahan dengan tempat duduk mangsa.

"Mangsa yang kritikal dihantar ke Hospital Parit Buntar untuk menjalani rawatan kecemasan. Bagaimanapun mangsa dilaporkan menghembus nafas terakhir jam 9.10 malam tadi.

"Dalam kejadian itu, pemandu kereta api itu hanya berhenti seketika memberi bantuan sebelum menyambung semula perjalanan. Pihak polis masih menyiasat punca kejadian, dan tujuan mangsa menggunakan laluan landasan berkenaan" katanya.

my metro/-

PAS letak 100 hari menjelang PRU 13

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 01:17 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -
Safarizal Saleh

10 Ogos 2011 (IPOH) - PAS telah mengarahkan semua jentera pilihanrayanya agar bersedia bermula daripada sekarang dengan kiraan 100 hari menjelangnya Pilihan Raya Umum (PRU) ke - 13 tegas Naib Presiden PAS Haji Salahuddin Ayub ketika program bersama PAS Kawasan Ipoh Timur di sini.

Salahuddin dalam ucapannya selepas menunaikan Solat Sunat Tarawikh bersama PAS Ipoh Timur menjelaskan bahawa keputusan Mesyuarat PAS Pusat baru-baru ini menjangkakan bahawa PRU 13 akan berlaku dalam masa yang terdekat.

'Saya ingin maklum bahawa peringkat PAS Pusat telah memutuskan bahawa semua jentera parti sudah dipersiapkan dalam tempoh 100 hari daripada sekarang dan kita menjangkakan PRU 13 sudah hampir dengan kita' jelas Salahuddin di dalam ucapannya di Markaz Unit Peti Undi (UPU) Taman Pengkalan Barat, Ipoh.

Beliau juga meminta semua peringkat parti mesti bekerja keras bagi memenangkan Pakatan Rakyat (PR) dalam PRU 13 ini untuk sama-sama sampai ke Putrajaya jelas Salahuddin. Beliau yakin semua Ahli PAS akan membantu jentera PR samaada PKR atau DAP untuk sama-sama bekerja keras kali ini.

Salahuddin yang hadir ke majlis berbuka puasa dengan Ahli PAS yang telah dianjurkan oleh PAS Ipoh Timur

Gejala murtad : UMNO tidak serius

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 01:18 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -
Safarizal Saleh

Dewan Pemuda PAS Pusat (Malaysia) menegaskan pendirian bahawa peruntukan yang telah termaktud di dalam Perlembagaan Negara yang menegaskan Islam sebagai Agama rasmi Persekutuan dan ruang lingkup yang memastikan agama Islam terpelihara di dalam negara kita adalah agenda berterusan tanpa korompomi daripada mana-mana pihak yang secara sengaja mencabar kedaulatan Islam di dalam negara kita. Jesteru kami ulangi bahawa usaha mengganggu-gugat institusi Islam akan berdepan dengan suasana yang sengaja mengeruhkan perpaduan yang selama ini kita capai yang tidak sepatutnya berlaku sama sekali.

Akan tetapi, bagi kami kepada sebuah parti yang kini memerintah negara atas nama Umno sepatutnya lebih prihatin terhadap suasana yang dibentuk secara tidak langsung atas pendekatan-pendekatan kerajaan ketika ini. Sebagai teguran serius kepada Umno, perkara paling kecil berkaitan menutup aurat pun langsung tidak diambil kira oleh Umno sehingga sekarang. Suasana inilah yang dilihat oleh pihak luar sebenarnya keringanan Umno meninggikan martabad Islam di mata bukan Islam. Walaupun menutup aurat perkara yang kecil tidak mampu dipertegaskan oleh Umno, bagaimana dengan agenda besar Islam yang lain akan dipastikan ianya berjaya kepada seluruh umat Islam tercapai.

Kami amat kesal usaha Umno meninggikan syiar Islam di dalam negara kita. Bagi kami apa yang berlaku, Umno perlu bertanggungjawab sepenuhnya kerana kekuasaan institusi Islam yang memakin hari, semakin dicabar oleh pihak luar yang langsung tidak diendahkan oleh Umno sebagai parti tulang belakang Barisan Nasional (BN) yang kini masih memerintah Malaysia. Banyak perkara yang berkaitan isu Islam yang dibiarkan oleh Umno tanpa membela atau menegaskan sepertimana yang jelas di dalam Perlembagaan Negara. Jesteru, kami merasakan kemelut yang berlaku kini semuanya akan diletakkan 'dibawah karpet' sahaja tanpa berlaku apa-apa penyelesaian selepas ini.

Pendedahan rasmi oleh Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri sebelum ini bahawa jumlah permohonan keluar Agama di Mahkamah Syariah sebanyak 863 kes sudah cukup membuktikan ketidak seriusan kerajaan menangani isu murtad dan kegagalan Umno untuk menjaga kedaulatan dan ketuanan agama Islam itu sendiri. Kami akan mempertahankan Perlembagaan Negara terutamanya Artikel 114 dan juga berharap dapat mempertahankan isu murtad ini, Jabatan Agama Islam Negeri-Negeri dan Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia (JAKIM) amnya perlulah juga mengikut peraturan dan prosedur dalam penguatkuasaanya berdasarkan Undang-Undang Negara.

RAJA AHMAD AL-HISS
Naib Ketua,
Dewan Pemuda PAS Malaysia.


Pemimpin BN tidak prihatin kepada rakyat .

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 01:07 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -

Najib Razak terus berbohong kepada rakyat dengan memperkenalkan NKRA ketujuh iaitu kononnya berusaha keras bagi menangani kos sara hidup rakyat yang kian meningkat.

Ini suatu yang amat bercanggah dengan keperluan rakyat yang sebenarnya, rakyat mahukan supaya sistem yang ada di Negara kini diperbaiki secara menyeluruh, selain menuntut pengagihan ekonomi secara adil dan tidak membazir, rakyat juga menuntut supaya pengurusan pilihanraya direformasikan secepat mungkin.

Beliau terus perbodoh rakyat dengan mengatakan kerajaan BN lah yang membela rakyat sejak merdeka, saya ingin menegaskan bahawa janji tersebut layak diketegorikan sebagai hikayat dongeng.

Sebenarnya Umno-BN telah gagal menguruskan khazanah Negara melalui pembaziran projek-projek mega yang menelan belanja berbilion ringgit .

Isteri PM telah memecah satu tradisi yang diamalkan oleh isteri PM sebelumnya dengan memamirkan kehidupan mewah yang melampau dalam keadaan rakyat sedang mengikat perut dan terus dihimpit kemiskinan.

Maka wajarkah Najib bercakap tentang kos hidup rakyat sedangkan batang tubuhnya tidak mengambarkan kehidupan rakyat yang sebenarnya.

Tatkala berlaku kepincangan terhadap ekonomi Negara, Umno-BN sering persalahkan ekonomi global pula walhal Negara yang kukuh ekonominya tidak bergantung sangat kepada gaya turun naik ekonomi di peringkat antarabangsa . Apalagi Malaysia adalah sebuah negara pengeluar minyak, di sinilah hujah kuat bahawa Najib telah gagal mentadbir negara, wajarkah beliau dan BN terus dipertahankan?

Rakyat lagi ditipu bulat-bulat apabila Najib Razak berkata bahawa Malaysia merupakan pemberi subsisi rakyat yang tertinggi, perkara ini tidak benar kerana subsidi rakyat yang dimaksudkan cuma berjumlah sekitar 3 bilion, itu pun tidak semua wang tersebut sampai kepada rakyat.

Cuba bayangkan jika subsidi kepada rakyat setahun berjumlah RM3 bilion itupun dalam perancangan ditarik, walhal rakyat Malaysia berada dalam lingkungan berjumlah 27 juta orang, ini bermakna subsidi yang sampai kepada setiap rakyat cuma lebih kurang RM111 untuk setahun, jelas sekali pemimpin BN tidak prihatin kepada rakyat?

Pakatan Rakyat telah menunjukkan komitmen yang jitu dalam membela hak rakyat, di Pulau Pinang misalnya, setelah kerajaan persekutuan mengumumkan bonus separuh gaji dan minima RM500 bakal diberi menjelang musim perayaan. Ketua Menteri mengumumkan lebih dari itu.

Kerajaan Pulau Pinang yang ditadbir PR memandang jumlah ini tidak memadai jika mahu bela kos rakyat, maka dengan serta merta Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang mengumumkan bonus minima untuk kakitangan kerajaan negeri berjumlah minima RM600 iaitu lebih seratus dari pemberian kerajaan persekutuan .

Di sini jelas kepada kita bahawa BN bukanlah kerajaan yang membela rakyat, kerana itu rakyat mestilah memberi jawapan yang paling tepat dengan sungkurkan BN pada PRU 13 nanti .

Drs. Khalil Idham Lim
Parit Buntar, 11 Ogos 2011

UK Riot Police Beating "Anyone"

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 01:44 AM PDT









This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

Liwat II: Dua lagi saksi potensi ditemubual

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 01:00 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -

Dua saksi potensi bagi perbicaraan liwat yang membabitkan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim ditemubual oleh peguam ketua pembangkang itu hari ini.

Mereka adalah pengawal peribadinya Mokhtar Mustafa dan pemandunya Abdullah Sani Said.

Mereka ditemubual selama hampir sejam oleh peguam Karpal Singh dan Sankara Nair.

Anwar turut hadir pada sesi temubual itu.

Menurut Karpal Singh, dua lagi saksi akan ditemubual esok. Mereka adalah pemilik kondominium di mana kejadian meliwat itu didakwa berlaku, iaitu Hasanuddin Abd Hamid dan Noor Sham Abdul Hamid.

"Tiada petunjuk bilakita boleh dapat temubual Perdana Menteri Najib Abdul Razak dan isterinya Rosmah Mansor.

"Mahkamah telah memberikan pihak pendakwaan tempoh seminggu untuk membekalkan saksi untuk ditemubual oleh pihak pembelaan sebelum perbicaraan membela Anwar bermula. Jadi kita tunggu dan lihat," katanya.

malaysiakini/-

Khutbah Jumaat : Bersatulah mempertahankan aqidah

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 12:48 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -

BERSATULAH MEMPERTAHANKAN AQIDAH

(12 Ramadhan 1432 / 12 Ogos 2011)

الْحَمْدُ لِلَّهِ الْقَائِلِ،

شَهْرُ رَمَضَانَ ٱلَّذِىٓ أُنزِلَ فِيهِ ٱلْقُرْءَانُ هُدًۭى لِّلنَّاسِ وَبَيِّنَـٰتٍۢ مِّنَ ٱلْهُدَىٰ وَٱلْفُرْقَانِ

Bulan Ramadhan yang padanya diturunkan Al-Quran, menjadi petunjuk bagi sekalian manusia, dan menjadi keterangan-keterangan yang menjelaskan petunjuk dan menjadi pembeda antara kebenaran dan kebatilanl" - Surah al Baqarah : 185.

أَشْهَدُ أَنْ لَّآإِلهَ إِلَّا اللَّهُ وَأَشْهَدُ أَنَّ سَيِّدَنَا مُحَمَّدًا عَبْدُهُ, وَرَسُوْلُهُ

اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ وَبَارِكْ عَلىَ سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ وَعَلَى آلِهِ وَأَصْحَابِهِ وَمَنْ تَبِعَهُمْ بِإِحْسَانٍ إِلَى يَوْمِ الدِّيْنِ

أَمَّا بَعْدُ فَيَا عِبَادَ اللَّهِ ! اتَّقُواْ اللَّهَ حَقَّ تُقَاتِهِ وَلَاتَمُوْتُنَّ إِلَّا وَأَنْتُمْ مُّسْلِمُوْنَ

Wahai hamba-hamba Allah !

Bertaqwalah sekalian kamu kepada Allah dengan sebenar-benar taqwa. Dan Janganlah kamu mati melainkan dalam keadaan Islam. Saya menyeru diri saya sendiri dan juga sidang Jumaat sekalian agar kita sama-sama meningkatkan ketaqwaan kita kepada Allah dengan melakukan segala suruhanNya dan menjauhi segala yang ditegahNya.

Hadirin yang dirahmati Allah,

Dr. Zakir Naik, seorang pakar perbandingan agama dalam salah satu dialog bersama penganut agama lain telah diajukan soalan; mengapa di Mekah dan Madinah tidak dibenarkan didirikan rumah ibadat agama lain sedangkan di negara bukan Islam lain termasuk England dan Amerika Syarikat membenarkan pembinaan masjid dan surau. Beliau menjawab adakah pihak sekolah akan membenarkan guru matematik yang mengajar muridnya 2 kali 2 bersamaan dengan 6 sedangkan pihak sekolah berkeyakinan bahawa 2 kali 2 bersamaan dengan 4. Maka bodohlah pihak sekolah yang masih membenarkan guru yang mengajar ajaran salah dari terus mengajar murid-murid mereka.

Oleh kerana orang Islam meyakini bahawa hanya Islam sahaja yang diterima Allah dan hanya Islam sahaja satu-satunya agama yang benar, maka umat Islam wajiblah menjaga kebenaran tersebut daripada dicemarkan jika mereka mempunyai kuasa untuk berbuat demikian. Allah berfirman dalam Surah Ali Imran ayat 19 :

إِنَّ ٱلدِّينَ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ ٱلْإِسْلَـٰمُ ۗ …..

Sesungguhnya agama yang diterima olleh Allah hanyalah Islam.

Sidang Jumaat sekelian,

Sesebuah negara Islam wajib mempertahankan Islam dan menjaga aqidah umat Islam dari dirosakkan oleh penganut agama lain. Mempertahankan aqidah umat Islam tidak boleh disamakan dengan menyekat kebebasan penganut agama lain dari melaksanakan amalan agama mereka. Apakah maknanya kita dipimpin oleh orang Islam jika Islam disamatarafkan dengan agama lain di negara ini. Apakah apabila kita boleh berdakwah mengenai Islam kepada penganut agama lain, maka mereka juga perlu diberi kebebasan bagi memesongkan aqidah dan memurtadkan umat Islam. Apakah apabila mereka boleh membaca terjemahan al-Quran dan buku-buku berkaitan Islam maka mereka juga bebas menyebarkan risalah agama mereka di kalangan penganut Islam. Jika itu yang kita maksudkan, tak perlulah kita berjuang mempertahankan kepimpinan kita mesti di kalangan orang-orang Islam.

Sidang Jumaat sekelian,

Serbuan dan Pemeriksaan Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor (JAIS) terhadap Gereja Methodist, Damansara Utama baru-baru ini telah menjadi bukti bahawa umat Islam tidak mahu bersatu walaupun melibatkan usaha mempertahankan aqidah umat Islam di negara kita sendiri. Berbagai pihak lebih ghairah menghentam JAIS seolah-olah tindakan tersebut adalah satu kesalahan yang amat besar dan bercanggah dengan undang-undang. Apakah mereka yang banyak bercakap ini benar-benar memahami undang-undang yang dikuatkuasakan. Apakah mereka menganggap bahawa pihak-pihak berkuasa agama akan melakukan tindakan tersebut sewenang-wenangnya tanpa melihat kepada keharusannya dari segi Syarak. Salahkah pihak berkuasa agama melaksanakan usaha pencegahan awal ( سَدُّ الذَّرَائِع ) bagi mengelakkan umat Islam dimurtadkan di negara yang Islam adalah agama persekutuannya.

Muslimin yang dirahmati Allah,

Umat Islam perlu lebih bijak bercakap sebelum mengetahui fakta sebenar. Kita mesti mengkaji atas alasan apa mereka yang terlibat tidak mendapat bantuan daripada pihak Baitulmal. Yakinkah kita bahawa mereka benar-benar layak untuk menjadi salah satu dari asnaf-asnaf zakat mengikut hukum Syarak. Apabila timbulnya isu kemiskinan dalam masyarakat, apakah kita hanya melihat kepada peruntukan zakat semata-mata sedangkan begitu banyak agensi dan yayasan lain yang ditubuhkan untuk membasmi kemiskinan dan mempunyai peruntukan yang lebih banyak berbanding zakat. Di mana pula peranan berbagai pihak wakil rakyat, pemimpin tempatan dan para hartawan yang beragama Islam sehingga menyebabkan mereka terpaksa mengharapkan belas ihsan daripada rumah ibadat orang-orang bukan Islam. Ini sebenarnya hanyalah membuktikan kepincangan sistem kemasyarakatan umat Islam yang sudah tidak lagi menghayati Islam yang sebenarnya. Kebanyakan dari kita hanya pandai bercakap berbanding berusaha, lebih banyak menuding jari berbanding menyumbang bakti dan tidak benar-benar prihatin terhadap sesama sendiri.

Muslimin yang dirahmati Allah,

Kita boleh menyalahkan berbagai pihak yang membiarkan kita terdedah kepada hasutan pihak luar. Namun hakikatnya bagi yang mempunyai maruah dan jati diri, kita sepatutnya tidak akan menggadaikan aqidah mereka dengan harga yang murah. Wajarkah masih ada lagi rakyat kita yang hidup merempat sedangkan pendatang asing yang datang sehelai sepinggang mampu hidup mewah di negara tercinta ini. Jika para sahabat sangup mati dan menanggung berbagai penyiksaan bagi mempertahankan aqidah, apakah wajar kita menggadaikan aqidah kita dengan hanya mengharapkan bantuan kewangan yang tidak seberapa daripada musuh-musuh Allah.

وَلاَ تَشْتَرُوا بِعَهْدِ اللَّهِ ثَمَنًا قَلِيلاً ۚ إِنَّمَا عِندَ اللَّهِ هُوَ خَيْرٌ لَّكُمْ إِن كُنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ ﴿ الأنفال : ٩٥﴾ مَا عِندَكُمْ يَنفَدُ ۖ وَمَا عِندَ اللَّهِ بَاقٍ ۗ وَلَنَجْزِيَنَّ الَّذِينَ صَبَرُوا أَجْرَهُم بِأَحْسَنِ مَا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ ﴿الأنفال : ٩٦﴾

Dan janganlah kamu jual belikan agama Allah dengan keuntungan dunia yang sedikit, sesungguhnya apa yang ada di sisi Allah adalah lebih baik bagi kamu, jika kamu mengetahuinya. Apa yang ada pada kamu akan hilang lenyap dan apa yang ada di sisi Allah tetap kekal dan sesungguhnya Kami membalas orang-orang sabar dengan memberikan ganjaran yang lebih baik dari apa yang mereka telah kerjakan.

Sidang Jumaat Yang dirahmati Allah,

Sewajarnya kita bersatu padu dalam memenangkan Islam dalam Negara tercinta ini. Usaha mempertahankan aqidah umat terlalu besar tuntutannya berbanding menjaga hati orang kafir walaupun ianya merugikan sokongan mereka terhadap kita. Semua umat Islam mesti mengenepikan kepentingan masing-masing dan wajib saling membantu pihak berkuasa agama dalam mengangkat martabat umat Islam dan mempertahankan aqidah ummat. Kelemahan dan kecacatan dalam sesetengah tindakan dalam usaha jihad ini hendaklah sama-sama diperbaiki. Kalau tidak ada suatu sumbanganpun yang boleh kita salurkan maka cukuplah sekadar mendokong dan menyokong dari belakang tidak hanya pandai mencerca dan mengeji.

بَارَكَ اللهُ لِيْ وَلَكُمْ فِي القُرْآنِ العَظِيْمِ وَنَفَعَنِي وَإِيَّاكُمْ بِمَا فِيْهِ مِنَ الآيَاتِ وَالذِّكْرِ الحَكِيْمِ وَتَقَبَّلَ مِنِّي وَمِنْكُمْ تِلاوَتَهُ إِنَّهُ هُوَ السَّمِيْعُ العَلِيْمُ وَاسْتَغْفِرُ اللهَ العَظِيْمَ لِيْ وَلَكُمْ وَلِسَائِرِ الُمْسِلِمْينَ وَالمُسْلِمَاتِ وَالمُؤْمِنِيْنَ وَالمُؤْمِنَاتِ فَاسْتَغْفِرُوْهُ فَيَا فَوْزَ المُسْتَغْفِرِيْنَ وَيَا نَجَاةَ التَّائِبِيْنَ

Cukup-cukuplah buat dosa, banyakkan pahala

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 12:43 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -
Ust. Ahmad Baei Jaafar

Berapa banyak lagi umat Islam hendak buat dosa, meskipun berada dalam bulan puasa yang ditawarkan dengan banyak pahala. Apakah mereka tidak berpuasa atau tidak sedar apa yang mereka lakukan sekarang itu satu dosa atau setidak-tidaknya boleh mengurangkan pahala puasa. Atau adakah mereka sengaja mahu menghina Islam?
Sepatutnya bermula bulan puasa kita kunci mulut yang suka buat dosa, kunci kaki yang suka buat dosa dan kunci tangan yang suka buat dosa. Kalau selama ini bertimbun dosa, hendaknya bulan ini bertimbun pahala dan dosa yang lama boleh terampun dengan taubat setiap hari dalam bulan Ramadan. Yalah, Rasulullah sendiri menegaskan; Ramadan awalnya Rahmat, pertengahannya Maghfirah dan akhirnya itqunminannar.

Apakah mereka tidak mahu Rahmat Allah, apakah mereka tidak mahu Pengampunan Allah, dan adakah mereka tidak mahu pembebasan daripada api neraka Allah. Kalau mahu mengapa masih mahu buat dosa? Tidak takutkah dosa itu berganda seperti bergandanya pahala. Inilah yang sangat menghairankan saya.

Minggu pertama puasa lagi ada orang Islam yang secara sengaja menyakitkan hati orang bukan Islam. Mereka timbulkan isu orang bukan Islam hendak murtadkan orang Islam. Apakah orang Islam yang masuk gereja sudah jadi murtad? Pada masa yang sama kita sudah menyakitkan hati orang Islam dan organisasi Islam. Mereka tuduh orang Islam tidak mahu bertindak menyelesaikan masalah dengan bijak. Apakah masalah besar boleh diselesaikan dalam sehari dua?

Mengapa orang Islam sanggup jadi ejen musuh Islam bagi merosakkan perpaduan ummah? Apakah mereka tidak sedar bahawa mereka sedang diperalatkan oleh pihak lain untuk menghancurkan Islam? Ya, mungkin dia tidak kena musuh Islam. Kalau begitu siapa musuh Islam itu? Untuk pengetahuan semua, ada dua musuh Islam yang sangat hampir dengan kita iaitu Nafsu yang sangat mengajak ke arah kerosakan dan kedua Syaitan yang niatnya untuk menyesatkan umat Islam.

Kini syaitan dirantai dan kurang berperanan untuk menggoda manusia, maka tinggallah nafsu sebagai penggoda tunggal. Kenapa kita tewas dengan nafsu? Janganlah kerana bencikan seseorang kita tidak nampak kebaikannya lagi. Janganlah tutup kebaikan orang hanya kerana hendak menaikkan kebaikan kita, nanti kesannya kita tidak beroleh apa-apa.

Bertaubatlah wahai umat Islam. Insafilah diri kerana dosa yang bertimbun itu kalau dipohon ampun dengan cara ikhlas akan diampun sepenuhnya. Lakukan ibadah dengan sempurna tanpa dosa lagi. Kemudian bayarlah zakat fitrah kepada AMIL yang dilantik kerajaan. Biarlah nanti orang yang berhak mendapat zakat boleh menyambut raya sama seperti orang lain.

Zakat penting dibayar oleh umat Islam kerana zakat harta adalah untuk membersihkan harta kita yang bercampur dengan hak orang lain di dalamnya. Kalau zakat tidak dikeluarkan bermakna kita akan terus makan hak orang lain.

Manakala zakat fitrah adalah untuk membersihkan diri kita daripada dosa sekali gus menyempurnakan ibadah puasa yang mungkin ada kekurangan. Kalau tidak bayar, maka selain berdosa, puasa kita tidak sempurna. Jadi, bayarlah zakat fitrah kepada amil.

Tetapi di sini juga ada timbul persoalan, mereka tidak mahu membayar zakat kerana fobia dengan penyelewengan pihak pengurus zakat. Dengan ini mereka secara tidak langsung menuduh badan tersebut tidak amanah. Bayangkan dengan sekejab sahaja mereka beroleh dua dosa, dosa tak bayar zakat dan dosa membuat fitnah.

Sebenarnya soal siapa pengendali zakat itu tidak timbul kerana zakat yang kita bayar itu sudah sah dan Allah sudah terima. Kalau pengendali itu tidak amanah lalu menyelewengkan harta tersebut, maka dosanya kepada Allah dan pastinya mereka akan dihukum. Kita tidak perlu risau urusan Allah, tetapi risaulah dengan urusan kita yang belum selesai ada ada dengan Allah dan manusia.

Obama dakwa warisi masalah hutang AS

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 12:42 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -

BARACK OBAMA memasuki kereta limousin selepas dia menghadiri majlis kutipan derma
untuk kempen dana Parti Republikan di sebuah kediaman peribadi di Washington kelmarin.

WASHINGTON, Amerika Syarikat (AS) - Presiden AS, Barack Obama semalam menyatakan, beliau 'mewarisi' sebahagian besar masalah negara termasuk hutang dan defisit yang tinggi daripada pentadbiran sebelumnya.

Kenyataan tersebut dilihat bakal menjadi tema kempen Obama untuk pilihan raya Presiden 2012 dalam usaha beliau menerajui AS untuk penggal kedua.

Sebelum Obama menerajui AS, George W. Bush menjadi Presiden AS selama dua penggal.

Bercakap pada satu majlis mengumpul dana Parti Demokrat yang memerlukan setiap keluarga dikenakan bayaran AS$15,000 (RM45,389) untuk bergambar bersamanya di sini, Obama mempertahankan dasar ekonominya dan memaklumkan bahawa masalah ekonomi di Eropah kini menjejaskan AS.

"Kita memang mempunyai masalah serius berkaitan hutang dan defisit yang sebahagian besarnya saya warisi," kata Obama.

Menurutnya, krisis kewangan yang kini melanda Eropah menyebabkan masalah itu menjadi lebih teruk.

Wakil rakyat Parti Demokrat dan Parti Republikan bersetuju untuk meningkatkan kadar siling hutang dan memotong perbelanjaan pentadbiran pada minggu lalu untuk membolehkan AS membayar hutangnya.

Namun, agensi penarafan kredit Standard & Poor tetap menurunkan taraf hutang AS dengan menyebabkan pasaran-pasaran saham utama menjunam kelmarin. - Agensi

Belum Ada Petunjuk Bila Boleh Temubual Najib, Rosmah-Karpal

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 12:30 AM PDT

11 Ramadhan 1432H. [MOD] -

KUALA LUMPUR 11 OGOS : Tiga hari telah berlalu, namun belum ada petunjuk bila pasukan peguam bela, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dapat menembual Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Razak dan isterinya, kata peguam Karpal Singh.

Mahkamah sebelum ini membenarkan permohonan Anwar menemubual 15 saksi sebelum beliau memberikan keterangan membela diri dalam kes fitnah liwat ke atasnya pada 15 Ogos ini.

"Mahkamah telah memberikan pihak pendakwaan tempoh seminggu untuk membekalkan saksi untuk ditemubual oleh pihak pembelaan sebelum perbicaraan membela Anwar bermula. Jadi kita tunggu dan lihat," kata Karpal.

Hari ini, dua lagi saksi dalam kes fitnah liwat Anwar ditemubual oleh peguam Karpal dan Sankara Nair.

Mereka ialah pengawal peribadinya Mokhtar Mustafa dan pemandunya Abdullah Sani Said.

Temubual itu berlangsung selama sejam lamanya,

Dalam pada itu Karpal memberitahu, dua lagi saksi akan dipanggil esok.

Mereka adalah pemilik kondominium, lokasi kejadian di mana Anwar didakwa meliwat bekas pembantu peribadinya, Hasanuddin Abd Hamid dan Noor Sham Abdul Hamid.

tv selangor/-

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)